I have seen and heard several attempts at turning the digits of Pi into music.

The highly-flourished music in this YouTube video is well-crafted. But I agree with the way one comment sums it up…

“So basically we’ve learned that any random sequence of numbers will sound reasonably pleasant if interpreted as notes in a major scale…”.

Yes. It is oh so convenient that the digits 1 through 8 can be mapped to the ever-so agreeable, politically-correct notes of the diatonic scale.

Don’t confuse this talented musician’s performance with anything remotely meaningful about the digits of Pi. Because……

**Pi is INDISTINGUISHABLE from a sequence of random numbers**. Extensive statistical analyses of the first six billion digits have been done to try to find tendencies, frequencies, repetitions, ANYTHING that constitutes a feature or a pattern.

Nothing.

Perhaps there is something in this apparently-random sequence that will someday reveal the existence of an **alien intelligence**. Yea, right.

Here is **Vi Hart’s reaction** to some of this musical Pi insanity…

At least **Jim Zamerski** has the sense to consider that Pi can be expressed in other bases than 10, for making music. But again, regarding the use of Pi as the raw input into this musical treatment, how much musical content is there?

NONE.

Personally, I would love to hear the results of a search algorithm that finds segments of Pi that come close to mimicking a famous melody. I have no doubt that “Happy Birthday To You” … using the digit 0 to represent a **rest**, and the digits 1 through 8 to represent the notes **G _{3} **through

**G**in the C-major scale … can be found somewhere in Pi.

_{4}Just for fun, I figured out what those digits would be. Here they are:

**11201040300011****201050400011****806040302077****6040504**

Sure, it might require wading through billions of digits using a special-purpose pattern-finding algorithm to get statistically close to this exact sequence. But at least the musician would have done some work. And it would be just as original.

What about “Pi Art”?

But meaningless. The digits of Pi are statistically no different than a random sequence of digits. Why not use the golden mean, or *e*, or the square root of 2? The digits in these irrational numbers are just as meaningless as Pi.

I submit that the best way to get creative over Pi is to think about its real meaning: Pi is the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter. This ratio shows up in some interesting, and sometimes unexpected, situations – like **Buffon’s needle**:

I will close with a simple, elegant expression of Pi. It may not be beautiful, but it says it all.